Sabri Lushi

The post THE CONSEQUENCES OF HAVING A WORLD GOVERNMENT appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

In other words, they use lies and propaganda so massively because they’re not interested in solving any problem in the occupied countries. It’s the process of supposedly finding the solution what matters the most.

For example, the American Government has been involved directly in the reformation of the Albanian judicial system since 2016. Even though nothing has changed, they continue to propagate the process.

Another example is the process of the integration of Albania in the EU. It has started almost three decades ago and continues to be a favorite topic for politicians and the media, including the US Embassy in Tirana.

As many people are fully aware of, such processes, which are pure American lies, are meant to last as much as possible in order to keep people busy because the occupiers, i.e., the American Government, are simply interested in maintaining their power; they’re not interested in solving the problems.

This is true for all occupiers historically, let alone for the American Government, which is the symbol of deception and lies.

To conclude, Albanians should know that many political processes in Albania take much longer than what people would expect not because the Albanian Government is corrupt, but because Albania is occupied.

Sabri Lushi

The post The American Government is the symbol of deception and lies appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

The French Revolution was not probably the worst terror; it was, however, the beginning of a new historical period which was filled with barbarism and wars in the mission of spreading the religion of Secularism, which was spread in the world within a century. In this context, one of the most interesting facts is that all the modern branches or manifestations of Secularism, such as democracy, communism, Marxism, fascism Nazism, liberalism, feminism, left-wing, right-wing, etc. idealize the French Revolution. This is to say that, in fact, all national governments do not have any ideological difference; all of them have adopted Secularism as their official religion regardless of different manifestations.

The difficulty that many people find with the idea of defining Secularism as a religion lies in the fact that, first, they are confused about the definition of religion, and second, secularists refuse to identify themselves as adherents of any religion for practical reasons. By refusing to define Secularism as a new religion, this puts secularists in a comfortable position in their war against the traditional religions. Rather, they claim to be in some state of ideological neutrality.

Nevertheless, Secularism fits perfectly in the definition of religion, which, among many other things, is a set of beliefs and principles that can serve as a guide for setting the moral and legal values, for interfering fundamentally with the social and political sphere, it serves as an ideological bond among its adherents, and it is revered so much so that it could incite wars and conflicts in order to defend or spread it. So, Secularism is a well-organized religion, whose adherents could be as fanatic and fundamentalist as any other religion.  

Nationalism, on the other hand, has been used not only as a political mechanism by the British Empire to maintain its political power worldwide but also as an ideological instrument in order to wipe out the old religions and facilitate the preaching of Secularism; in this way, the latter has managed to avoid a direct confrontation with the traditional religions, especially with Islam.

In conclusion, Secularism is a religion – rather an extremist one, and it is not ideologically natural as secularists fanatically claim.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE RELIGION OF SECULARISM AND NATIONALISM appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

This shows once again the agenda of this anti-Albanian government for ethnic cleansing and encouraging people to abandon their own country. This is a blatant form of occupation and oppression. Albanian children are not allowed to obtain the Albanian citizenship. This is preposterous.

Considering that our laws are written by and our judges are appointed by the US State Department, there is no point to accuse the Albanian Government for anti-national policies. I point the finger at one entity for this genocidal policy, that is, the US State Department, which is responsible for all corruption and oppression in Albania. If the Albanian Government represents the Albanian people and works for them, why then this genocidal law, which practically bans children from obtaining their native citizenship.

Some might argue that the US Government is our strategic ally. The reality speaks for itself. With such allies who needs enemies. Allies do not impose genocidal laws; they do not support terrorists in politics; they do not control judges and write laws and support ethnic cleansing. The US Government is not the ally of the Albanian people; in fact, it is a close ally to the corrupt politicians, to immoral judges, to criminals and terrorists of politics, to spies and agents. Lay people have no ally. They are the target, indeed.

By the way, I’ve always wondered why the US companies have the monopoly on digital court records everywhere. Could this be because the US monitors all the courts around the world? Technically, yes. Therefore, the whole concept of judicial independence in the world is a joke.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE ETHNIC CLEANSING LAW IN ALBANIA appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

As regards to success, typically we think that those who are talents and study hard, they can do well; they can get ahead in life. But if we think more carefully about the reality, things might and might not be as we assume.

To reiterate, education provides us with two important tools in life: knowledge and kills, which are necessary to succeed. At the same time, educational system is a monopoly of governments. It is certified, controlled, financed, supervised, and accredited by governments or independent institutions for that matter, which still are part of the system.

Therefore, education is not exactly a public domain. Ideally, the government is supposed to serve people without any discrimination. However, we all know the real world.

But what I want to point out here is not to say that the real world is a little bit messy or corrupt. Beyond the seeming mess, there is actually a more insidious organized way of controlling education.

According to my humble observation on this matter, while educational system seems to be open for all, sometimes even in a messy way, the truth of the matter is that only those who are spotted, allowed and designated by the system – both the educational and political system, to succeed, only they can succeed. The rest, either are given the chance to waste some good years of their lives or they are trashed altogether.

So, it is certain that, first, education is the most scrutinized part of the state apparatus and nothing happens randomly or coincidently, and second, talented students are not allowed to succeed at all except those few who are carefully permitted by the system. Talented people are considered ‘dangerous’ and ‘problematic’, so “get rid of them”.

This could be perhaps just a perception because it is hard to have access to enough data to reach a definite conclusion. But it is easily observable that education is not as we typically think. Yes, it is vital, but it is not a public domain.

Is this the beginning of going back to the medieval ages? In essence, history is always repeated. We tend to think that this time is different from before, but it is more a wishful thinking than a reality.

In conclusion, if you couldn’t succeed in school for whatever reason, you’re not alone and most probably it was not your fault. It was part of a plan, albeit not obvious. However, this does not mean that you don’t have to work hard or study hard. There is always a way. Control is exercised by those who are afraid, not by those who really think they have everything under their control.

Sabri Lushi

The post EDUCATION: WHO IS ALLOWED TO SUCCEED? appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

We can only imagine what was going on. Populations were under constant pressure by their governments. Citizens were forced to serve the intelligence services in the justification of protecting the country against a major enemy. Refusing to serve the country as a spy was simply not a choice. Theatrical alarms were constantly sounded. In some countries, the land was filled with grotesque bunkers to convince the population about the enemy.

The target of espionage was also the domestic population. The enemy could have penetrated inside the country through their spies. Hence, counterespionage was as important as espionage itself.

The sad reality is that counterespionage involved an activity that required ordinary people spying on each other, friends spying on each other, family members, work colleagues, spouses spying on each other, employers spying on employees, and vice versa.

The complexity of espionage and counterespionage could have reached a frightening level, which no one knows. Maybe even the top intelligence service officials had no authority to articulate or think about the degree of this activity. Also, it could be described as a plauge affecting all the countries. We can only say that the logistics were available to do what we cannot imagine. All countries more or less were affected the same.

And what makes the whole picture so interesting is that this reality was identical in both blocs: West and East.

The critical question is: with the end of cold war, did this crucial and pervasive activity came to an end as well? After all, even if the governments wanted to discontinue it, was it possible?

In my opinion, that activity never ended. Rather, it was upgraded. There was no reason. In fact, the cold war could have served as a provisional stage to achieve a more dystopic objective: everyone under control, everyone spying on each other.

But, another even important critical question is: who is the enemy then?

My friends, every individual in this world is very, very important and unique. So, all of us are enemies. All of us are a target. There is no two-groups: one against the other. The ultimate goal of espionage and counterespionage was and continues to remain: to divide people, to oppress one another, to control one another, so the governments – all over the world, can do their job easily.

A Latin prover says, “Homo homini lupus” – a man is a wolf to another man, is more true than ever, except that wolves don’t act like us; they cooperate and protect one another. Maybe it is time to learn from them.

In short, there is no foreign enemy, my friends. We are the enemies. Maybe a member of intelligence services thinks they are fighting the enemy, while they themselves are the target.

Remember: everyone is important in this world.

Sabri Lushi

The post WHO IS THE ENEMY? appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

And I am not talking about some dictatorship countries of Asia or the middle east. I am talking about some western countries which claim to be the top democratic ones, in their appearance of course. For such immoral and anti-human rights governments, governments that in the past have caused one of the most heinous genocides – by murdering children, raping women, destroying families, mass murder of children, it is not enough to use judges for political oppression; they extend their vicious and immoral actions to the employers and the private business.

While the actions of such genocidal and immoral governments reach the level of terrorism, it is a shame on every judge, on every governmental official who gets told by the politics what to do, and every private business owner or employer who obeys the illegal orders of the government for oppression and mistreatment of employees. Shame on such immoral and corrupt governments, which claim to support democracy around the world, while at home they are just as oppressive and horrible as the governments they claim to scorn.

#stopstateterrorism

Sabri Lushi

The post Clear acts of State Terrorism appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

Professor Wolff notes that the capital was owned by few, who at the same time ran the government of USSR.

What I want to underline from this argument is that, in my view, it is not at all a coincidence that the capital was owned by few in USSR and it was not a confidence at all that those few ran the government, which implies that those few did not actually represent people in the way socialism or communism claimed.

In my opinion, it is not a failure at all what happened in USSR. Contrary to what is claimed by different political ideologies, the power always is held by few who either have blood relationship or they form a blood-like bond. It is like a private organization. The power is not for all, whether we are talking about West or East. To enter the circle of power of the elite, one has to undergo barriers and many, many check stops.

If we take Saudi Arabia, as an seemingly archaic form of state, where a family of 30 thousand members run the state and own the capital, it is almost identical in all countries: the capital is owned by very controlled people of the circle, the government and the political decisions are made by the de facto a private organization called government.

This is how I explain the so-called failure of the USSR, different from professor Wolff’s. Coming from Albania, where the manifestation of a modern secret state was at its best, we have some first-hand experience.

The 30 000 thousand family members of Saudi Arabia, who control all the capital, money, who live luxurious lives, who steal the wealth of the country, this is not an isolated model of governance at all. The West and the East are identical, no matter what the form of government is called.

This is not to say that all the family-owned and privately run governments act the same, and all are corrupt. They are the same though when it comes to political dissent: nothing is to be tolerated.

In this regard, of the people, by the people, for the people, is merely a slogan to cover up the modern form of government that is run by a group of people who either are members of the same family or have similar bonds, forged by mutual private economic and ideologic interests.

This is not a secret, and technically this is how the power works. People should know. Therefore, the idea to change the power is fruitless; rather, to articulate our legitimate demand for justice, freedom, basic rights and accountability, is realistic.

Nderim Lushi

The post STATE CAPITALISM AND POWER appeared first on Sabri Lushi.