In this regard, history can be understood by doubting its official version, by taking into consideration the morality of people at this particular time – that they lie and deceive, and all the political interests of the ruling elite, i.e., the British Secularists and the British Monarchy.

We can say with certainty that the institutionalization of evil and its adoption as the official religion has started with the rise of the British Empire. What are the factors that led to the success of this empire and what made it dominate the rest of the world, this is a totally different topic. The reasons, for example, could consist of a combination of objective factors and coincidence, too.

The evolution of evil could have started with the a serious retreat and the decadence of the Roman Catholic Church. Black Death could have been another factor. The decline of the Islamic civilization definitely has contributed a great deal to the rise of the British Evil.

Besides, the expansion of the Evil Empire in the rich American continent has been probably the underpinning factor which led to its political and economic advancement.

Then, the evolution of evil continued with the formation of the American Republic, a political system which was unprecedented in the whole human history. For the first time, the political power was hidden while the British Monarch started to assume an undercover political position. I think that the formation of the US Republic made the British Evil unfettered and a serious threat to the world.

The British Evil baffled the world by bringing down soon after the French Monarchy and by executing King Louis XVI in 1793. Thus, the British Empire embarked on its serious journey to rule the world. The mission was accomplished in 1924 when the final Islamic caliphate, i.e. the Ottoman Empire, was abolished.

Today, the British Evil has morphed into hundreds of governments and international institutions. It has become the normal, the system, and the encompassing politics. It rules the world militarily, economically, politically, and ideologically. This evil – its barbaric laws, evil Secularism, the corrupt ideology, injustice, social degradation, immorality, deception, extremist pragmatism etc., has evolved into a cancer that is killing human society.

Confronting the British evil is not the task of Muslims alone; rather, it should be the job of us all.

Sabri Lushi

January 2024

The post THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVIL appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

The British Secularism operates on lies. I don’t know any other political system or previous civilization to have employed or adopted the concept of lying as much as this British pagan religion.

Perhaps, the Egyptian pharaoh symbolized a political system which had institutionalized the concept of lying and deception, hence the employment of magicians. However, the pharaoh’s case was different. His power was local and the Egyptian civilization was not global no matter how much advanced it was compared to other regions of the world. Also, the government of that time didn’t have access to the media or means of communication the same way that our Secular governments have.

For this reason, the British Secularism is not simply more corrupt than the ancient Egyptian political system, which had institutionalized the concept of lying and the art of deception, but it is more dangerous.

For the first time in human history, we are ruled by a ruthless political system, i.e., the British Secularism, which holds global power. It controls the media, the economy, the global politics, the military, the academia, universities, schools, businesses, scientific research, and it holds more or less the monopoly on information. Thus, it is a very powerful political system whose influence is beyond imagination.

As the famous saying goes, “power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” This is the case of the British Secularism. It holds absolute power while its corruption has reached the extreme.

The British Secularism has deteriorated completely. It has become the symbol of lying, deception, dishonesty, backstabbing, immorality, exploitation, delusion, extremism, corruption, debauchery, and evil.

Secularism has reached a stage when it only lies and deceives. One can never trust a Secularist. In fact, I am afraid that Secularists cannot even trust themselves.

Secularism is seeking to cling to power like leeches. It is seeking simply to control people, to lie to them, to pass another day or night, to keep them waiting – waiting and waiting, because Secularism has no solution and no capability to address honestly any issue. It is a vicious ideology.

The British Secularism is resorting to propaganda and drugs – literal drugs, to merely intoxicate people as it cannot solve any problem. In fact, Secularism is the problem. It is destroying everything: society, economy, environment, morality as well as it is polluting human souls with its opiate.

The sooner the British Secularism and all the corrupt institutions of the British Empire disappear, the better for us.

Sabri Lushi

January 2024

The post THE BRITISH SECULARISM: OPIATE OF THE MASSES appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

They want to tell us that the British Empire, ruled by a thousand year old dynasty, which reached its military and economic peak in the 20th century, an empire that practically conquered the entire world, including Muslims, somehow had to yield to the requests of the Jewish people to build a state of their own in a time when the concept of state or country had become merely an administrative unit within the British Empire anyway.

They tell us that during WWI, when the British Empire and its European soldiers defeated the Ottoman Empire, somehow the British needed the help of the USA – never mind the fact that it was a republic under the rule of the British King; therefore, the Zionist lobby requested from the US President to impose on the British Monarchy to form a country for the Jewish people – as if these people were already living in Mars; hence the Balfour Declaration in 1917.

In order to convince us with such a fictional story, they tell us that Jews owned the banks, so the British King – who commanded a large army, had to beg them for money and in return he promised them a state. I wonder if the King had no power and no money, what kind of state was he able to promise to the Jewish people?

Moreover, when terrorists such as Mustafa Kamal, Ahmed Zogu, Enver Hoxha, Stalin or other British agents who were put in power by the British ruler, how come that they had no problem to confiscate the properties and money of the old elite, especially those who inherited wealth from the Ottoman Empire? It seems the British Empire had no problem confiscating the money of such people, but a handful of Jews or Zionists had the power to impose demands on the British King and his American viceroy, otherwise known as the US President.

What I’ve figured out recently is that the British politics treats us like idiots and fools. They circulate political ideas and theories that normally a lay person would feel embarrassed to talk about where the British politics has the capacity and the deceptive power to articulate things which are a complete lie, a joke or totally ridiculous, yet no one is able to point the finger at the King who is wearing no clothes.

The British Empire is a naked empire, but no one is able to tell the king that he’s wearing no clothes.

Going back to Israel and Zionism, we all know that it was the British Empire the one which formed the state of Israel as a strategy to keep Muslims under pressure, or perhaps to oust King Farouk I of Egypt from power; we all know that Jews were used and exploited by the British Empire – today no one remembers the crimes of this empire, but only the crimes of the tiny Israel; yet we continue to repeat the same lie: Zionism is using America and the British Monarch.

Sabri Lushi

The post AMERICA, THE BRITISH MONARCHY, AND ZIONISM: WHO’S USING WHO? appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

The economic control has been a unique feature of this bloody empire. Much of its political and military resources have been allocated to the mission of the economic control of nations. Much of its scientific discoveries and academic work has been dedicated to the control of the world’s capital.

It is not a coincidence that all the political theories originate from London or the Great Britain. We live under an economic system which has been invented and founded by Karl Marx, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Thomas Robert Malthus, John Stuart Mill etc. “The Wealth of Nations” of Adam Smith points out exactly the political ambition of the British Empire to control the world’s economy.

Not only from a theoretical, moral, academic and philosophical point of view, but also from a practical aspect, the British Empire has been very successful at spreading its enormous control – through communism, big corporations, confiscation of land, elimination of the old elite, confiscation of gold, invention of fiat money and giving the government all the power to print money as much as it wishes, as well as through a highly complicated and deceptive legal system imposed on the world.

Currently, the British political power controls all the world’s capital. To make it clear, it is not the rich, the corporations, the CEOs, the banks, them, they, the deep state – all abstract entities that we hear on the media, but the British Empire and its global political system.

If you want to start a business today, if you want to start a farm, if you want to sell products on the street, if you want to invent a machine in order to use it for agricultural or industrial purposes, if you want to build a family hydropower plant, if you want to build a house or a building for business purposes, we will not have problems with banks, nor will we be confronted by the CEOs, the rich, they, them or whatever – because we have nothing to do with them; our problem will be with the police officers, with the prosecution service and judges who apply corrupt and oppressive laws, laws that have been passed by corrupt and dictatorial parliaments, parliaments and governments that have been put in place not by the people, but by the British Empire and the British Monarchy.

Our biggest enemy today is: laws written and conceptualized by the British politicians in a way that serve the British power and the British Monarchy, and the economic system that has been founded by the British Monarchy’s agents, which is oppressing us.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE CONTROL OF CAPITAL appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

In order to justify morally the killing and murder of innocent children, they are trying to find examples from the modern history and draw an analogy. “Churchill did it in Dresden, Germany, where American and British Air Force attacked the city in 1945 and murdered and killed over 25,000 people, including children and civilians,” they are saying.

To make their argument more convincing and compelling, they are emphasizing the fact that, “Churchill is the greatest politician of the 20th century and the most important one in the modern times,” as if Winston Churchill – the prime minister of a colonial power, is undisputedly the epitome of fairness and morality.

Surprisingly, the Israeli Jews and some rabbis are not referring to some better examples of war, but they consider Winston Churchill – this secularist and pagan, as the moral standard and as their admired leader.

This shows once again that Israel is not a Jewish state, built upon Jewish moral principles, but it is a state that has been formed by the British Empire and the likes of Churchill in order to serve a political purpose.

This shows that there is actually a connection between what Churchill did in Dresden in 1945, when WWII was de facto over, and what the Israeli Government is doing in Gaza. This shows that those who controlled the British Air Force are controlling precisely today the IDF, and that is, the British Monarchy. IDF and British Air Force are under the same command.

Winston Churchill could have been a successful prime minister, a very devoted servant of the British Monarchy, a murderer, a shrewd politician, a pagan, a colonialist who benefited the British Empire, but by no means was he a moral example of politics and wars.

Churchill was a genocidal politician. He was a terrorist. He was a war criminal and a pagan. At the same time, WWII is one of the most immoral, unclear, full of secret agendas, and controversial wars of human history, yet the staunch and sick supporters of the Israeli genocide in Gaza are trying to justify these unjustifiable horrors with absolutely some shameful examples.

In short and to all immoral British and American mercenaries who are murdering babies in Gaza: murdering children is wrong, genocidal, and devilish. Only pagans, Godless, and dark-minded people can look for examples in human history to justify the killing of children.

Shame on you, terrorists!

Sabri Lushi

November 2023

The post WINSTON CHURCHILL AS A MORAL PARADIGM OF THE GENOCIDE IN GAZA appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

Islam is a realistic religion. It takes into consideration the real nature of things. Different from Secularism, it is not a utopian or theatrical ideology. Therefore, Islam offers genuine solutions. It deals with humans and social phenomena, including political power, the same way it deals with nature and natural phenomena.

For example, we all know that gravity is a natural force, which exists universally and consistently. We accept it because it is only sane to do so. As a result, we deal with nature by taking it into consideration. We never try to ignore it; rather, we act accordingly because gravity is there for a purpose.

Likewise, Islam teaches us that nature cannot be changed even when it comes to social phenomena – humans are part of it, no doubt. For instance, sexual attraction and the desire for power are part of our nature, so we should learn how to deal with it. Their existence has a purpose.

According to Islam, when men see women, it is absolutely natural to be attracted sexually. It is a natural power. So, we should not change it, as it has a purpose, but the society should deal accordingly. Therefore, Islam proposes that women should cover themselves, they should avoid their exposure to men as much as possible, and follow certain guidelines which take into consideration the power of sexual attraction.

Political power falls into the same category. The nature of political power is to control, oppress, and have access to every individual. It is not to be blamed for that. It is part of its nature, whether it is held by Muslims or Secularists.

Accordingly, Islam proposes certain mechanisms how to deal with this power, whose very nature is to control and oppress. If the subjects follow Islam’s guidelines, such as not lying, not betraying, not deceiving, not stealing, not gossiping, not spying, not obeying any law or order which contradicts God’s commandments, not drinking alcohol, avoiding interest, not breaking the law, not breaking the promise or violating agreements, and again, giving priority to Allah’s commands and rules over anyone else, if people follow all of these guidelines, in fact no tyranny will survive and no dictatorship will last.

On the other hand, Secularism proposes exactly the opposite. It teaches us to ignore the nature of things. In short, it denies nature. It promotes a completely theatrical and imaginary view about the world; therefore, it offers the best fertile soil for tyranny and dictatorship.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE APPROACH TO TYRANNY: ISLAM VS. SECULARISM  appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

Language has never been a criterion which the British Empire has used in order to form its administrative states around the world. It is true that language is used to unify somehow the people of the newly formed states and instill in them a new identity, but that has not been the criterion.

There are countries in the world whose people speak tens or even hundreds of different languages, and in many cases such languages and dialects are totally mutually unintelligible. India, Papa New Guinea, China, Russia and many regions in Africa or South America are some examples. Therefore, the British Empire has not applied the criterion of language in order to form countries or administrative states, otherwise there would have been thousands of countries.

There are other criteria which the British Empire has used when forming the new countries, such as guaranteeing permanent conflicts, exploitation of natural resources, not letting Muslims form a big country, and the formation of other Secular powers in order to dominate the world easier, typically the formation of the USSR (now Russia) and the People’s Republic of China – the biggest allies of the British Empire.

In the Middle East, for example, even though people speak the same language, especially in the Arabian Peninsula, the British Empire has split it into some dozen countries and sometimes one country has a territory within another one, as it is the case of the UAE and Oman. The Arabian Peninsula could have not become one Muslim country because it would have become dangerous for the British Empire. China and Russia, on the other hand, should remain big because they are the biggest allies of the British Empire and the US Government.

Likewise the Balkans could have not been allowed by the British Empire to form one country because at the beginning of the 20th century Muslims were the majority. If Muslims had formed a single country in the Balkans, they would have become a very powerful state in Europe. The objective has been not to let Muslims flourish, but kill and expel them. So, clearly the British Empire and the US Government split the Balkans only to harm Muslims, and they continue to propose ideas to incite more conflicts and split it even more.

Again, language or ethnicity have nothing to do with the balkanization of the Balkans. This is a British and American deception. The British Empire is a master of lies. It always appears to be heedless of the most important factor, for which it is fighting.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE BALKANIZATION OF THE BALKANS AND THE INCONSISTENT AND DECEPTIVE ARGUMENT OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE  appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

It seems that the balkanization of the Balkans, a term which was coined by the British Empire to outline its policies regarding the occupation of this region, has not ended yet. However, the question which begs itself is: why did the British Empire split this relatively small region into so many countries? Why do the British Empire and the US Government incite permanent conflicts in this region?

First of all, it is crucially important to underline the fact that the Balkans does not have a more complicated diversity of population than France, Germany, Spain, Italy or Mexico, for example. On the contrary, I would argue that the Balkan population is culturally and racially very homogeneous. If an Albanian, a Greek and a Serbian in Canada or the USA meet with someone of Indian origin, the latter would definitely classify them as belonging to the same ethnic group, as they look the same, they show similar cultural traits and their languages have very similar linguistic phonemes and intonation even though they’re not mutually intelligible, similar to the dialects of Germany.

Nevertheless, there is one important element which made the British Empire split this region into many separate countries, that is, the religion of Islam. After the collapse of the political power of Muslims in Spain and the massive expulsion of them from it, Islam did not leave the continent; rather, it flourished in the Balkans.

Not only was the dream of the western Europe to clear the continent from Islam not achieved, but Muslims became an even more powerful political power once the Ottoman Empire took control of the Balkans. The Peninsula soon became of Muslim majority and they were a political power to be reckoned with.

When the Balkans was occupied by the British Empire at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, it had one mission: to achieve the old dream: expel Islam from the continent; therefore, Muslims of the Balkans were to be killed, persecuted, murdered, and split into many countries so they would live as minorities. It is not a coincidence that WWI and WWII were heavily focused on this region. The mission of the British Evil Empire to expel Islam from the continent has not been accomplished yet, so the Balkan Muslims will continue to be threatened by the US Government and the British Empire until the last of them is expelled or killed.

The British Empire and the US Government are the biggest enemies of Islam and Muslims, especially of the European Muslims.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE BALKANIZATION OF THE BALKANS: WHY? appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

If we look carefully into his words, we will notice that he actually is not denying God at all. This is not the point he was trying to make even though it might seem that he is proving to the believers that there is no God. Slyly, he was trying to convince the audience that actually God is responsible for all the injustice in the world.

In my view, Secularism has combined rationalism and pragmatism in a very strange way. For example, a Secularist policy maker does not ignore the reality. If there is injustice in the world, injustice in the most natural sense of the word, he or she will not argue that it does not exist; rather, they will try to blame someone else for it.

That’s exactly what this man did. He admits that there is great injustice. By appearing as if he’s denying God based on this fact, he is, cunningly and foolishly at the same time, blaming God for this injustice. In other words, he is telling people – who all of them deep in their hearts believe in the existence of a deity, that there is injustice, but let’s blame God for it, that He is not able to alleviate it.

In fact, the response to this propagandist of Secularism is very easy. The world today is ruled by and large by man made laws; it is not ruled by the laws of God. Even Saudi Arabia, which is considered the country that applies the Islamic laws the most, rules to a certain extent by the British Secularist laws. So, the world today is dominated by the laws of the British Empire. Our parliaments pass laws which they make, judges pass judgments based on such laws, and the great majority of people live their lives according to Secularist laws and norms.

Therefore, blaming God for all this injustice when we don’t rule according to His laws is immoral. All the governments around the world do not adhere to God’s laws, but to the laws of the British Empire.

I totally agree with this man, that there is great injustice today in the world, but God is not responsible for it; it is the British Empire and its Secularist governments solely responsible for it.

According to the Qur’an, God has given free will, power, brain, and rational abilities to people, so it is not He Who commits injustice, but people and their laws. The world today is ruled by British Secularist laws, not by the laws of God, so the Secularist politicians should have the audacity to take responsibility for all the mess they’ve created and all the injustice they’ve committed.

This British propagandist should blame his government for the injustice, not God.

Sabri Lushi

The post GOD, SECULARISM, AND THE INJUSTICE OF MAN appeared first on Sabri Lushi.

I don’t believe that the Rising British Empire of the 19th and the 20th centuries had a special consideration or animosity for the Albanian people because of their skin color or language – which after all was a vernacular language, which was not used to store some special knowledge. None of this is true even though it is politically convenient for British historians or their agents in Albania to affirm this.

There is no doubt that what made Albanians distinguished from other people of Europe, what made them be on the British Empire’s radar, what made them confronted and the target of the White Man’s continent was none other than the religion of Islam. Albanians were predominantly a European Muslim nation, as well as they were part of one of the most important empire of human history, that is, the Muslim Caliphate.

On the other hand, the agenda of particularly the western Europe has been for centuries to block the religion of Islam from settling in the continent. In fact, I would argue that the biggest enemies of Islam have always been Europeans or the descendants of the Roman Empire. It is true that Genghis Khan and his Mongol Empire caused irreparable damage to the Islamic Civilization, but that was almost an exception, a divine punishment of God against the mistakes of Muslims; it was not an ideological war because soon the Mongol people and the grandchildren of Genghis Khan embraced Islam.

It is only the Europeans that have maintained a consistent and organized war against Islam and Muslims, which was demonstrated at its highest level during the medieval crusades.

So, Albanians and the British Empire have been and continue to be foes, not friends regardless of the British propaganda and lies. Believing, for example, that NATO – the de facto British Empire’s army, bombed Milosevic in order to save Albanians – the old enemy, is preposterous and a lie.

The British Empire and its European puppet states continue to be the biggest enemies of the Albanian people, who are predominantly Muslim. Europe is the archenemy of Islam and Muslims, so we should not fool ourselves. Muslims in Bosnia, Albania, Greece, Kosovo etc. were not killed by crazy dictators – who some of them were even members of the British Monarchy, but by the British Empire’s agents.

Albanians need to know this fact. We should never trust the British liars, those who killed and murdered our ancestors over the last century. It was not our vernacular language which made us special, but the religion of Islam – the religion of justice and peace and tolerance, not the British religion of crusades and communism.

Sabri Lushi

The post THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND ALBANIANS: FRIENDS OR FOES? appeared first on Sabri Lushi.